Determinants of Rural Households’ Decision Making to Forgo Income for Bequeathed Woodlot in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya

  • Andrew R Kiptum University of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya
  • Joel K. Sumukwo University of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya
  • Paul Okelo Odwori University of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya
Keywords: Woodlot, Livelihoods, conservation stewardship, agro-ecological

Abstract

Forests are an important economic good in providing dependable products by rural households such as fuel wood, food supply, natural insurance and as habitat for pollinators; however, unchecked household characteristics that abet exploitation and/or unsustainable consumption of forest products expose livelihoods of rural households who are forest resource dependants to be at perilous state. Therefore, this study sought to examine demographic and socio economics determinants that influences rural households decision making to forgo income for conservation through bequeathed tree planting in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Systematic random sampling technique was applied in selecting samples whereby a total of 234 structured questionnaires were administered to rural household’s heads for interview. Results from regression analysis showed that rural households with existing woodlot in their farms and family size were negative and significant at (-2.501, p< 0.05) and (-1.857, p< 0.1) respectively, which suggests to influence the desire for rural households not to forgo income for bequeathed woodlot in their farm, while constructs of dependency level on forest products by rural homes 1.720, p< 0.1, the costs of establishing woodlot at 0.992, p< 0.001 and agro-ecological condition of land at 1.784, p< 0.1, which were positive and statistically significant were likely to influence rural homes to engage in tree planting as insurance venture for the future generation of which $234.19 was the likely annual premium. In conclusion, the critical determinants that influence rural homes’ decision making to forego income for bequeathed woodlot informs policy makers, scholars and resource managers on rural households’ characteristics needed while formulating strategies and policies needed for up-scaling forests land cover to mitigate climate change effect. However, the positive and statistically significant of stochastic variable from OLS model, which explains variables that were omitted and/or were beyond the scope of this study and remained unobserved, showed influence on rural household decision making to forgo income for conservation stewardship; hence, creating knowledge gap for further investigation.

Article Views and Downloands Counter


Download data is not yet available.

References

African Women’s Studies Center. (2014). Status report on the Kenya national food security. Nairobi. University of Nairobi Press.

Ayalew, D., & Deininger, K. (2012). Cause and implication of credit rationing in rural Ethiopia: The importance of spatial variation. Policy Research Working Paper No 6096, The World Bank e-library.

Baland, J. M. Bardhan, P., Das, S., Mookherjee, D. & Sarker, R. (2010). The environmental impact of poverty: Evidence from firewood collection in rural Nepal. Economic Development and Cultural Change 59(1): 23-61.

Cao, G., Zheng, C., Scanlon, B. R., Liu, J., & Li, W. (2013) .Use of flow modelling to assess sustainability of groundwater resources in the North China Plain. Water Resource Research, 49, 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR011899

Gebreegziabher, Z., Mekonnen, A., Kassie, M. & Kohlin, G. (2010). Household tree planting in Tigrai, Northen Ethiopia: Tree Species, Purposes and Determinants. Working Paper in Economics, 432. University of Gothenburg Department of Economics.

Worku, G. K. (2017). Agro forestry and farm income diversification: synergy or trade-off? The case of Ethiopia. Environmental System Research (2017) 6:8. Doi: 10.1186/s40068-017-0085-6

Huang, J. C., Shaw, D., Chien, Y. L., & Zhao, M. Q., (2015). Valuing environmental resources through demand for related commodities. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 053.

Keenan, R. J., Reams, G. A., Achard, F., de Freitas, J. V., Grainger, A., & Lindquist, E. (2015). Dynamics of global forest area: Results from the FAO global forest Resources assessment, 2015. Forest Ecology and Management, 352, 9-20.

Kerr, M. J., Vardhan, M., & Jindal, R. (2014). Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services. International Journal of the Commons, 595-616.

KNBS. (2010). The 2009 Kenya population and housing census. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology, methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International (p) Ltd. Publishers, New Delhi [online], [cited 16 December 2018], Available at: https://www.modares.ac.ir/uploads/Agr.Oth.Lib.17.pdf

Nuru, F., Abdallah, J. M., & Ngaga, Y. M. (2014). Opportunity cost of REDD+ to the communities of Mufindi District, Iringa, Tanzania. International Journal of Forest Research Volume 2014 page 7. ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/697474

Pant, K. P., Rasul, G., Chetri, N., Rai, K. R. & Sharma, E. (2012). Value of forest ecosystem: A quantitative estimation from the Kangchenjunga Landscape in Eastern Nepal. Kathmandu. ICIMOD working paper 2012/5

Pasco Consultants. (2013). Report on national forest resource, mapping and capacity development, (NFRMCD), For The Republic of Kenya, Vol 2.

Van den Nouweland, A. (2013). Lindhal Equilibrium. Retrieved from http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~annev/research/Lindahl/fulltext.pdf
Published
2020-04-30
How to Cite
Kiptum, A., Sumukwo, J., & Odwori, P. (2020). Determinants of Rural Households’ Decision Making to Forgo Income for Bequeathed Woodlot in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Africa Journal of Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 5(1), 154-165. Retrieved from http://afritvet.org/index.php/Afritvet/article/view/112